The Vlade Dilemma
Monday, March 30th, 2009Back when I was spending time around the high-flying Sacramento Kings of the early ought-oughts, I had a stock answer for anyone who asked about the relative personalities of the team’s stars. What I said was that if my sons had only one minute to meet a player, I’d want it to be Chris Webber – but if they had a week, I’d want it to be Vlade Divac.
That’s the two in a thimble. Webber could make that one minute last a lifetime for most kids; with his brilliant smile and his empathetic, almost folksy approach to his young fans, he could create an instant memory. He was – and remains – every bit that magnetic. Off the charts.
Divac, though, went deeper on so many levels that the comparison is almost unfair. Here was a man who had really lived, who had come to America from some other place to find his opportunity and stardom, who had seen his beautiful Serbian homeland ravaged by war and political strife. Here was a family man, a socially active man, a world-connected, sometimes weary, very, very funny man – a sweetheart encased by more than 7 feet of frame and 260 pounds of bulk. Vlade was a three-dimensional star, and you don’t have to be around pro athletes long to realize how incredibly rare that is.
With that said, the Sacramento Kings are about to make their second mistake of the season. Having already retired Webber’s jersey, they will do the same with Divac’s No. 21 on Tuesday night. It’ll still be the wrong call amid all the great vibes, standing ovations and video memories.
I don’t go old-school very often, but on the subject of jersey retirement I’m willing to draw the line. Hanging up the jerseys of guys who never won the Kings a championship? It just screams mediocrity. What, you’re never going to have a ring to celebrate? Good grief, aim higher.
Divac and Webber were central to the winningest seasons in Kings history, and that is absolutely worthy of annotation. But jersey retirement signals something so far beyond just piling up some wins that it doesn’t even compute here. Why stop at two non-titlists? What about Jason Williams? Mike Bibby? Doug Christie? Rick Adelman?
Where’s a Ring of Honor or Circle of Fame when you really need one?
Two retirement ceremonies, for beloved players who nevertheless both spent more years in the NBA with other teams than they did with the Kings, has struck many ticket-holders as a bald-faced money grab by a franchise struggling at the gate and (obviously) on the court. I don’t see that, but I understand the take. That’s a ticket-holder kind of a mindset – What are they hoovering out of our pockets now? – and it’s symptomatic of the kind of antipathy being aimed directly at pro sports for their outrageous pricing structures. At a billion dollars a ticket, you’d better win.
As for Divac, I’d build the man a statue and put it next to Webber’s on the lawn at the main entrance to Arco Arena, then move it to the new place, wherever that may be. Divac, the three-dimensional modern star, is certainly worthy of whatever superlatives anyone wants to throw his way. But the next time a Kings jersey gets retired, it really ought to be that of the player who brought the Sacramento franchise its first title. Anything else is something else. Until then, put some handprints in wet cement and call it a day.
-30-